Most of us LF/MF and topband diehards have been looking forward to the next
several years of low solar activity ... maybe even 'ultra-low' as some of the
solar gurus are predicting.
An interesting posting on the
Topband reflector a few weeks ago by noted propagation expert, Carl, K9LA, made me re-think my expectations!
I flagged the post for a later blog topic but
have since seen the information pop-up on a couple of other reflectors as well
as on the
ARRL News page. Apparently I wasn't the only one to give the posting a
double-take. If you missed it, here is Carl's post:
About a week ago Wolf DF2PY posted a message here commenting on the
recent adverse levels of geomagnetic field activity and how it will now
change for the good - giving us good 160m propagation.
We'll certainly
see less geomagnetic field activity as we move into winter,
but there's
another issue we should be aware of. The Sun's magnetic field
is weakening -
probably to the lowest levels in our lifetime. With a weak
solar magnetic
field, more galactic cosmic rays will be able to get into
the Earth's
atmosphere. We are now seeing unprecedented high neutron counts (neutrons are
one of the by-products of cosmic rays)
Since galactic cosmic rays are
mostly *very energetic* protons, they can
get down to low atmospheric
altitudes, causing collisional ionization in
the D region (and lower E
region). A cursory estimate using cosmic ray
ionization rates confirms more
ionization in the lower atmosphere. 160m is
not very tolerant of more
absorption, so we may see an adverse effect of
the weakened solar magnetic
field.
Many of us think that "solar min is solar min is solar min". But
maybe a
solar minimum can be too deep for 160m. A good question to ask in the
early 2020s will be "how was 160m?" So stay active on 160m and let's see
what happens.
Carl K9LA
My
initial response was to think that perhaps there wouldn't be as much to look
forward to as I had been hoping for, when it came to improved LF, MF and 160m
propagation. Carl's postulation was also backed-up by another mention on the
Spaceweather site, although the influence of cosmic ray bombardment on radio
propagation was not discussed.
As I thought more about this unfortunate
possibility actually coming to pass, I thought back to my own on-air and
listening experiences during previous solar-low years ... particularly the unprecedented low
between our most recent cycle and its predecessor, Cycle 23.
The low
period between these two cycles, as most will likely recall, saw the quietest
solar conditions observed in the past 100 years. The solar-low winters saw week after week of a blank Sun, with solar activity virtually flatlining for the entire period. In 2008 there were 265 'zero sunspot' days and the following year saw another 262 days of blank suns!
These effects were well noted here for two winters that are usually prime 'DX
times' ... if ever there were a period when cosmic ray bombardment should
negatively impact low frequency propagation, surely it would have been then.
So just what
did I observe?
What I saw was not only what I had been expecting but was much much better than
I had ever believed possible. For west coast topband operators, the 'holy grail'
of propagation is working Europe. Working Europe from here means that signals
must travel through the polar regions, usually the kiss-of- death for weak
signals, as the severe attenuation through the auroral zone means that it just
doesn't happen very often ... except for this prolonged period of ultra lows. In
a word, conditions to Europe were 'spectacular' ... night-after-night, for
several weeks over a period of two winters, working Europe on 160 became normal.
On most nights, European signals could be heard before local sunset, and
on several occasions, CW contacts with Europeans, were completed up to one and a half hours before my local
sunset. As darkness set in, more signals would appear and the band would rapidly become populated with Europeans ... and only Europeans.
Most of the
time there were no signals from North America evident, just Europeans ... a
condition that had me shaking my head in disbelief night after night. It was
something I had never observed before, as I watched 160m behaving more like 20m
CW on a good day to Europe! During this period, my DXCC totals skyrocketed from 99 to 143 worked, as new Europeans and Africans were added to my logbook.
Signal
levels were also outstanding, often pushing the FT-1000 S-meter well past the S9
level. On one particular night, I recall hearing an SM4 calling CQ, with just
such a signal. I set my output power level at 10 watts and gave him a call, to
which he quickly responded. If cosmic ray bombardment was at a high level, it
was not reeking any havoc as far as the west coast path to Europe was
concerned! For the record, my topband system is nothing special, consisting of a
simple 'half-sloper' over a poor ground and a very old amplifier running about
500W output.
My other favorite winter pastime is chasing NDBs in the MF range between 200-500 kHz. Exceptional east west conditions were
evident throughout the two winters of ultra-lows.
On one such night, I noted a
new strong signal where none had been previously heard. Because of its strength,
I surmised that it was probably a new NDB in nearby Washington state. Noting its
ident ('NYA' on 414 kHz), I was not able to find any reference to such a beacon
being previously reported and turned to the
Yahoo ndblist group for help,
posting my catch as 'unidentified'. Almost immediately I received a response, telling me that the signal I was hearing was located in Europe ...
Svalbard to be exact, located midway between Norway and the North Pole!
Now, European NDBs have never been heard from the west
coast, other than occasional signals from some of Greenland's powerhouses, so
this represents a very rare event. Although I have often listened for this
signal, it has yet to be heard here again and my logging of remains its only
reported foray into any part of North America. Unfortunately, in 2015, it was listed as 'decomissioned'. I have no doubts that this rare propagation was a result of the solar flatlining conditions of the time.
As chilling as Carl's warning sounds, he himself admits uncertainty with a 'let's wait and see' attitude and after reviewing my own experiences under what surely
must be similar conditions, I'm still very optimistic over what might be in store. Hopefully we shouldn't have to
wait too much longer to find out!